A discussion on another blog sparked this. There seems to be an issue where the “kink community” thinks they invented kink and therefore they get to codify it and determine what is real and what is fake. (And I use that phrase even though I know everyone who identifies as part of it isn’t like this, but when I say this in quotes like that, I’m talking about the people who have appointed themselves our “leaders” whether asked for or not.)
Dominance and submission have always been with us. Always. While I fully recognize the fact that homosexuality exists, femdom exists, malesub exists, and people who are so equal in their relationship there is no other term for them but “vanilla” exist, and all those things are valid expressions of humanity … the vast majority of human beings, females tend to feel a biological drive/urge to submit, and males tend to feel a biological drive/urge to dominate.
This has caused many problems. For people who don’t feel these majority drives, they’ve been made to feel somehow less human or worthy. Which isn’t true. Something being the most common expression of something isn’t the same thing as the other expressions being wrong. But the very existence of differences makes the mandating of male domination over females abusive. And even if that tendency existed in all people, there is still too much room for abuse of that power when it is turned into not only “biological law” but “legal law.”
So we had these things like the women’s movement, which I think did many wonderful things, but then crossed the river into crazyland. And a lot of people don’t know their roles anymore. I’m not talking about the people who are naturally not a part of the male dom/female sub schema. I’m talking about people who ARE, but their cultural indoctrination has made it shameful.
Women now tend to angst if they want to serve a man. Oh the horrors! Not that! I mean we haven’t evolved that way for survival or anything. (sarcasm.) Somehow it is “shameful” to be nurturing, to want to take care of a household, to want to please a man. Kink or no kink. We haven’t even gotten to kink yet.
Men also tend to angst. Our culture looks at men as monsters and dolts. They’re either too moronic to handle their own lives, or they’re just monsters waiting to crawl out of their caves and attack the village. Men aren’t allowed to be dominant because it could “lead to abuse.”
If I listened to the “warning signs” pamphlets for domestic violence, I would be cautioned to run far far away. Almost every expression of dominance, even completely non-violent expressions, just an assertion/signal of who is top dog, is “abuse.” We’ve so “abused” the term abuse, that now, while women can happily berate their husbands who are holding their purses in the middle of the mall or grocery store, if a man said half the shit women say, it would be labeled: “verbal/emotional abuse” and of course we all know that’s just a tiny microstep away from physical abuse.
So this leaves, IMO a lot of discontent amongst the sexes, and a lot of sex lives that dry up within the first few years of marriage. I mean how can such an institution survive when women aren’t allowed to please their men even if they want to, because it’s just not feminist. And men aren’t allowed to take their woman in hand, no matter how gently or lovingly, without being two steps away from Monsterville.
So out of THIS, we have the huge influx of kink. Because some men, and some women even if wired this way, can pretend. It’s not such a deep and major part of them they can’t blend and be “normal.” But for others of us…we’re at the farther end of that spectrum. The urge to submit to a dominant male, or the urge to dominate a “helpless” female, is so encoded that there is no way to fully express it, BUT with what we now call kink.
But what we now call kink is not a new invention. There were times and places when women were property. (I’m not saying this was ethical or okay as an across the boards pronouncement or didn’t lead to abuse of power, I’m just saying, what we have now isn’t how the social structure has always been.) There were times and places when men spanked their wives, and this was just common practice. Times and places where most women addressed their husbands as “Master.”
That behavior, if consensual, would be called kink today. So besides domination/submission and spanking and titles, shit we’ve always had in one form or another…what is actually different?
Well today, we have kinky stores and videos and books. We have all kinds of complicated sex toys and bondage equpiment and state of the art floggers and canes. So basically we’ve upgraded to heavy merchandising.
Props, and expressions of a thing are not the thing itself.
This is why I don’t consider myself all that “weird” or “different” from much of the population. Sexuality and power dynamics have always been a continuum from one extreme to the other. There has always been a large variety of human sexual expression.
The “kink community” has become in many places, an insular little group, in which they can convince themselves they are very “different” and “special” from the rest of the population and human hierarchy/sexual interaction. But they are not. But it’s hard for some people to accept that most people aren’t that different from them, when they can’t openly be who they are as the full expression of who they are without denigration.
But that’s society’s issue, not biology. Just because a group of people stand around all day denying their biology, doesn’t make it reality. Nature marches on. (And again, this is not to say that homosexuality or male sub or femdom is denying one’s nature or biology. While it seems to be the minority of human sexual expression, it is also natural biology in many people.)
And in the event that sounds a touch too “Gorean” for you, I hate to say this, but Norman did not “invent” this idea about evolutionary biology and the sexes. In fact, in many ways he perverted it, because life on Gor is cruel, and all his books tend to do is reinforce the idea that extreme feminism was a good thing, to protect women from such cruel use. I do get that fiction and nonfiction are different subjects, but it gets sticky with the Gor novels…but that’s a different post. This has already gotten too long.